Minggu, 28 April 2019

Which Tech Company Is Uber Most Like? Its Answer May Surprise You - The New York Times

SAN FRANCISCO — Pop quiz: Which technology company does Uber, the ride-hailing giant on the cusp of an initial public offering, consider itself to be the most like?

Is it Lyft, its rival North American ride-hailing firm? Nope.

How about Didi Chuxing, Uber’s equivalent in China? Nah.

It’s Amazon, the e-commerce giant.

On the surface, the two companies have little in common. Amazon sells books, toilet paper, toys — pretty much everything, really — and it provides cloud computing services and makes artificially intelligent speakers. In contrast, Uber lets people hail rides through a mobile app.

But just as Amazon began as a modest online bookseller before growing into a digital retailing behemoth, Uber wants people to believe its ride-sharing business is the foundation for a larger “platform” spanning multiple transportation industries. Like Amazon, Uber is no stranger to taking on competitors across many areas to accelerate its growth. And also like Amazon, Uber is willing to lose geysers of cash to achieve its aims.

This Uber-is-like-Amazon argument will grow louder starting on Monday, when the ride-hailing firm’s top executives begin meeting investors on a so-called roadshow ahead of its I.P.O. next month. As part of its pitch, two people close to the company said, Uber plans to say that it is O.K. for it to lose money right now because — just like Amazon, which was unprofitable for years — it needs to burn cash to build out its business for the future.

Dara Khosrowshahi, Uber’s chief executive, has not been shy about the Amazon analogy.

“Cars are to us what books were to Amazon,” he said at a Fortune tech conference in July. “Just like Amazon was able to build this extraordinary infrastructure on the back of books and go into additional categories, you are going to see the same from Uber.”

Image
Amazon has always cared more about customers than Wall Street, which meant it was willing to spend aggressively to get ahead of competitors and create new businesses even if investors carped.CreditDemetrius Freeman for The New York Times

Uber declined to comment, citing the quiet period before it goes public. Amazon declined to comment on Uber.

Shawn Carolan, a venture capitalist at Menlo Ventures and an early investor in Uber, said the Amazon comparison is apt. “Because the ubiquitous need for transportation is so huge, they’re able to cross-sell different products to their existing customer base,” he said of Uber.

As it goes into its roadshow, Uber faces two main issues. One is that it needs to tell Wall Street a growth story — something to convince investors that its best and most lucrative days are still ahead of it. For years as a private company, that growth came easily as it expanded its service into more and more places across the world.

But nearly a decade later, that growth has slowed. In an amended offering prospectus on Friday, Uber said revenue growth in the first quarter was roughly 20 percent, less than half of what it was a year ago. As ride-hailing has evolved from a luxury business to a mass-market service, competitors have multiplied and the number of people using the service may be starting to max out as Uber finds fewer new locations to expand into.

Uber’s other issue is its lack of profit. The company lost $1.8 billion last year excluding onetime gains; it lost $1 billion or so in the first quarter of this year alone. Because ride-hailing is expensive to operate — Uber continually needs to spend to lure riders and bring on new drivers — some critics have wondered if it will ever be able to make money.

All of this explains why citing Amazon is so useful.

The Seattle-based retailer has always cared more about customers than Wall Street, which meant it was willing to spend aggressively to get ahead of competitors and create new businesses even if investors carped. Then just as Wall Street patience wore thin, Amazon produced profits that underlined the innovation machine that Jeff Bezos, its chief executive, had built over many years.

Image
“We want to kind of be the Amazon for transportation,” Mr. Khosrowshahi said.CreditAnastasiia Sapon for The New York Times
Image
Amazon’s chief executive, Jeff Bezos, invested in the business and made it seemingly impregnable in many areas.CreditJim Watson/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images

In 2014, for example, Amazon was hit hard by investors amid slowing sales growth and the introduction of the Fire Phone, a smartphone that landed with a thud. Then a year later, Amazon disclosed how large and profitable its cloud computing business had become. For almost a decade, Amazon had plowed money into building data centers and an army of engineers and sales people. When it finally broke out the details of the cloud business, it turned out that Amazon Web Services had $5 billion a year in sales and was growing almost 50 percent a year, with fat margins.

Now all of Amazon’s investments over time have made it seemingly impregnable in numerous areas, from logistics and delivery to cloud computing. Wall Street is not complaining about Amazon anymore, and it has become one of the world’s most valuable public companies with a market capitalization of about $960 billion.

“Uber, like Amazon, operates with an obsession on customer value over anything else,” said Mitchell Green, a venture capitalist at Lead Edge Capital, which invested in Uber.

Amazon’s experience is meaningful for Uber as it also expands into new businesses to set the stage for future growth.

Those include Uber Eats, its restaurant delivery service. Started in 2014 as an experiment, it became part of a line of thinking that Uber could one day deliver anything and everything to people whenever they wanted it, at the touch of a button. Internally, that idea was called Uber Everything.

While Uber Everything stalled, Uber Eats boomed. The division is on track to book more than $10 billion in deliveries in 2019, up from $6 billion in 2018. It is also projected to take a 27 percent share of the food delivery market by the end of 2019, up from 3 percent in 2016, according to Wedbush Securities.

Uber is also building Uber Freight, a service that matches local truck drivers with shippers in the United States and the European Union. It has contracted with more than 36,000 carriers serving more than 1,000 companies, according to filings, and the business generated more than $125 million in revenue in the final quarter of 2018.

In addition, Uber acquired Jump, an e-bike and scooter company, last year and is working on autonomous vehicles. Mr. Khosrowshahi has said he plans to make Uber the hub for many modes of transportation, from cars to bikes to scooters to cities’ public buses, trains and subway systems.

On Friday, the company also said in its filing that it was working on its payments infrastructure, which is used by more than 91 million people to pay for rides and by the company to instantly pay its drivers.

While it invests in its future, Uber will continue to lose money. So the company needs Wall Street to put up with its spending on these initiatives before they potentially pay off with profit. And it needs investors to be patient as it also works to turn its core ride-hailing business into a moneymaker.

That leads back to the Amazon comparison. If Amazon can pull it off, so the thinking goes, then Uber can, too.

“Just like Amazon sells third-party goods, we are going to also offer third-party transportation services,” Mr. Khosrowshahi said in an interview with Recode last year. “We want to kind of be the Amazon for transportation.”

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/28/technology/uber-amazon-roadshow-ipo.html

2019-04-28 19:36:14Z
52780278331384

China's BYD reports 632% jump in profits as rival Tesla falters - Quartz

Electric car maker BYD is speeding ahead of Tesla with respect to profitability. The Chinese company today (April 28) reported a 632% jump in profits in the first quarter from a year ago. Days earlier, the US car company led by Elon Musk announced one of its worst quarters ever.

BYD is the world’s largest electric vehicle maker (membership), though its brand isn’t widely recognized outside of China. It started out as a battery maker about 25 years ago and transitioned into the car business a little more than a decade ago, making both conventional fossil fuel-powered cars and “new energy vehicles.” The success of its first mass-produced hybrid caught the attention of legendary US investor Warren Buffett, who in 2008 bought a 10% stake in BYD for $230 million. That investment seems to be really paying off right now.

There is increased demand for electric vehicles in China, BYD says, and it expects continued growth. The company’s profits rose to about 750 million yuan ($111 million) in the first quarter, compared to 102 million yuan a year ago. BYD sold 117,578 new energy vehicles in the quarter, up 5% from a year ago. The company is now selling more electric vehicles than conventional cars.

“New energy vehicles are expected to continue to sell well in the second quarter, and new energy vehicle sales and revenues continue to maintain strong growth,” the company’s latest stock exchange filing reports. According to Reuters, BYD expects to sell 655,000 cars in 2019, a substantial portion of the 1.6 million electric vehicle total that China’s Association of Automobile Manufacturers predicts will be sold this year.

In stark contrast to this positive news for BYD, its US rival Tesla lost nearly $700 million in the first quarter. It attributed over $120 million in losses to a higher return rate than expected after it raised prices for the Model S and Model X. In its quarterly earnings call, Tesla chief financial officer Zachary Kirkhorn described the first quarter as “one of the most complicated… in the history of the company.”

Beyond its faltering quarterly profits, Tesla also had some bad news in China to contend with recently. Last week, a video that circulated widely on Chinese social media showed a parked Tesla Model S abruptly caching fire in Shanghai, where the company plans to build its first overseas factory. Earlier in the month, a parked Tesla in the US also caught fire.

The two electric vehicle makers do have something in common, however. Tesla and BYD both plan to expand into each other’s markets. China is the world’s largest car market, and the US comes second.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://qz.com/1606881/chinas-byd-reports-632-jump-in-profits-as-rival-tesla-falters/

2019-04-28 18:44:00Z
52780279791569

Technology's $1 Trillion Rally Keeps On Rolling With ETF Inflows - Bloomberg

[unable to retrieve full-text content]

Technology's $1 Trillion Rally Keeps On Rolling With ETF Inflows  Bloomberg

For technology stocks, the superlatives are endless this year. But rather than take profits and run, investors are flooding the space.


https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-04-28/billions-keep-on-coming-after-technology-s-1-trillion-rally

2019-04-28 17:05:00Z
CAIiEH_m2nDRpBbwFfHQzBZIsvwqGQgEKhAIACoHCAow4uzwCjCF3bsCMIrOrwM

Chinese electric car maker BYD's first-quarter profit up 632 percent - CGTN

Chinese electric vehicle maker BYD Co Ltd, backed by U.S. investor Warren Buffett, reported on Sunday a 632 percent jump in its first-quarter net profit, buoyed by strong demand for its new energy vehicles.

The Shenzhen-based car and battery maker, which has a joint venture with Daimler AG in China, said last month it expected first-quarter profit to rise by up to nearly 800 percent.

Profit surged to 749.73 million yuan (111.4 million U.S. dollars), up from just 102.4 million yuan a year ago, when its earnings fell sharply due to cuts to subsidies for electric vehicles.

BYD said it expected half-year net profit to rise to 1.45 billion yuan to 1.65 billion yuan, versus 479.1 million yuan in the same period last year.

"New energy vehicles are expected to continue to sell well in the second quarter, and new energy vehicle sales and revenues continue to maintain strong growth," the company said in a stock exchange filing, adding that new passenger and commercial vehicle models will help boost revenue.

China's market for electric cars is booming, but profits in the sector have been squeezed by fierce competition between established firms and rival startups, as well as moves by Beijing to cut subsidies for the market to improve product quality and standards.

The company sold 117,578 vehicles in the first three months this year, up 5.2 percent from a year earlier. BYD, whose popular models include its Tang-series electric cars, has said it aims to sell 650,000 vehicles in 2019.

Overall electric car sales in China jumped 61.7 percent in 2018 to 1.3 million vehicles, according to China's top car industry body China's Association of Automobile Manufacturers (CAAM). It sees electric vehicle sales hitting 1.6 million this year.

China last month raised its standards for electric cars that qualify for subsidies and reduced the amount it is willing to provide to relevant companies.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.cgtn.com/news/3d3d414e7a4d7a4d34457a6333566d54/index.html

2019-04-28 14:16:27Z
52780279791569

Uber's fresh IPO plans capped off Lyft's brutal first month on the stock market. Here's everything we know since its debut. - Business Insider

Lyft's performance since going public.Lyft's performance since going public.Business Insider/Yutong Yuan
  • Lyft went public one month ago Monday.
  • It's been an awful few weeks for shares since their March 29 debut, falling 35%.
  • Uber, Lyft's main rival, is primed to make its stock-market debut next month.
  • Here's what the last month has shown us about Lyft's early reception and what risks lie ahead.
  • Watch Lyft trade live.

Lyft shareholders haven't had much to cheer about since the ride-hailing company went public in its historic debut one month ago.

With the stock down 20% from its initial pricing and 35% since its opening trade, Lyft's brutal performance has set the tone for its larger rival Uber and a host of other companies to hit the public market this year.

And Uber is weighing on Lyft's stock even before its own debut. Lyft shares fell to a fresh post-IPO low on Friday after Uber updated its S-1 filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, saying it is now seeking a valuation of up to $90 billion — well below the $120 billion it had previously expected. Lyft shares saw a similar sell-off earlier this month when Uber first filed to go public

Read more: Lyft sinks to new low after Uber files to go public, highlighting Wall Street's competition concerns

But investors have learned more about how the market views Lyft, and where the stock might go from here once Uber begins trading. Here's what we know about short interest, competition, and more in the weeks since Lyft's debut on the public markets.

Exclusive FREE Report: The Self-Driving Car Race by Business Insider Intelligence

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.businessinsider.com/lyft-stock-price-everything-we-know-about-first-month-trading-2019-4

2019-04-28 13:00:36Z
52780278331384

Fidelity and Schwab Customers Can’t Get Vanguard’s Cheapest Funds - Barron's

Photograph by Lost Places

As a longtime Fidelity customer (and former writer for its web site), I’ve long appreciated the company’s customer service and wide array of investment choices. But when I tried to buy the Admiral class shares of a Vanguard mutual fund recently, I was politely told that it wasn’t available—no matter how good a customer I was.

Vanguard, it turns out, is keeping some of its lowest-cost products off the shelves of fund “supermarkets” like Fidelity and Schwab. While investors can purchase most Vanguard mutual funds at these firms, they will have to buy directly from Vanguard if they want the lowest-cost Admiral shares of its actively managed funds.

The situation is an odd one, and it’s a byproduct of changes that Vanguard made last year in its dual-class structure of mutual funds. Vanguard has long had two classes of shares: Investor and Admiral. Investor shares have lower investment minimums and higher expense ratios than Admiral. But Vanguard harmonized the two classes for its index funds last year: It lowered investment minimums for Admiral to $3,000 from $10,000, and started replacing Investor shares with the Admiral class. That, in turn, opened up the Admiral class of index funds to ownership and sales through third-party brokers like Fidelity and Schwab.

But Vanguard left its dual class structure in place for its actively managed funds, reserving the Admiral shares for purchase exclusively from Vanguard. Even if you meet the investment minimums, starting at $50,000, you’ll have to buy directly from Vanguard if you’re a “retail” customer, though advisers can gain access to Admiral through accounts that are custodied elsewhere.

The difference in annual fees can add up. Vanguard High-Yield Tax-Exempt Fund (ticker: VWAHX), for example, is an actively managed municipal bond fund. It has an expense ratio of 0.17% in the Investor class versus 0.09% for Admiral. If you were to invest the minimum $50,000, the extra cost in the Investor class would be $40 a year.

Read our recent cover story: Fidelity Is Thriving. Here’s What It Needs to Keep Thriving.

That isn’t much in additional expenses, but it adds up for larger investments. Plow $300,000 into the Investor class of the fund and the extra cost jumps to $240 per year. For a $1 million portfolio, the additional expense would be $800 more in the Investor class. That doesn’t assume any capital gains or reinvested dividends that would grow the account and magnify the effect of saving a few hundred dollars in annual fees (something Vanguard stresses in much of its marketing materials and fund literature).

Vanguard, of course, has done more than any other fund company to exert downward pressure on fees. Vanguard says it runs funds “at cost,” and it routinely reduces fees when its own costs decline, pressuring other companies to lower fees to stay competitive.

But Vanguard is facing more competition in its core index-fund business. Expense ratios industry-wide have been declining for years. Several firms now sell index funds that beat Vanguard’s prices, including Fidelity’s new suite of zero-fee index mutual funds.

Moreover, Vanguard is still in the business of gathering assets, and it’s trying to keep investors in-house for its services, which have expanded to include more retirement and advisory products, along with more actively managed funds. Maintaining the exclusive rights to sell its low-cost Admiral shares for active funds is one way to prevent firms like Fidelity or Schwab from poaching client assets.

Editor's Choice

“Vanguard is saying, ‘Why should we offer our best priced item on someone else’s shelf when we want investors to stay with us?’” Daniel Wiener, editor of monthly newsletter The Independent Adviser for Vanguard Investors, tells Barron’s.

Brokerage firms, for their part, have scant incentive to make it any easier to buy Vanguard products. Not only does Vanguard compete against their funds, but Vanguard has never paid for fund distribution. Fidelity and other brokerage firms have long chafed at Vanguard’s refusal to pay for distribution. Some fund companies pay more than 0.15% of fund assets to be on Fidelity’s platform, for instance. Those fees are increasingly important to brokerage firms as expense ratios decline and investors migrate out of actively managed funds to low-cost index products.

“Vanguard doesn’t compensate us for the services we provide,” a Fidelity spokeswoman told Barron’s. “That’s why there’s a higher transaction fee for its funds,” she added, referring to the $75 fee that Fidelity charges to buy a Vanguard fund, well above its normal $49.95 rate.

Vanguard, for its part, appears unlikely to budge on making its Admiral-class active funds available at other firms. “There are no plans to do so at this time,” a Vanguard spokeswoman tells Barron’s. And the firm is plowing ahead with new actively managed funds, including one focused on commodities and another on stocks that screen well for environmental, social, and governance factors.

Both are likely to have Admiral shares that are available exclusively from Vanguard.

Write to Daren Fonda at daren.fonda@barrons.com

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.barrons.com/articles/vanguard-lowest-cost-funds-fidelity-retirement-schwab-51556315451

2019-04-28 11:00:00Z
CBMiYmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJhcnJvbnMuY29tL2FydGljbGVzL3Zhbmd1YXJkLWxvd2VzdC1jb3N0LWZ1bmRzLWZpZGVsaXR5LXJldGlyZW1lbnQtc2Nod2FiLTUxNTU2MzE1NDUx0gFmaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYmFycm9ucy5jb20vYW1wL2FydGljbGVzL3Zhbmd1YXJkLWxvd2VzdC1jb3N0LWZ1bmRzLWZpZGVsaXR5LXJldGlyZW1lbnQtc2Nod2FiLTUxNTU2MzE1NDUx

Is This a Market Melt-Up? Here Are Some Ways to Tell - Bloomberg

[unable to retrieve full-text content]

Is This a Market Melt-Up? Here Are Some Ways to Tell  Bloomberg

Once again, stocks are hot. Following a drubbing late last year, benchmark indexes have been grinding higher as investors keep piling in, setting *fresh* all-time ...


https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-04-28/is-this-a-market-melt-up-here-are-some-ways-to-tell-quicktake

2019-04-28 06:00:00Z
CAIiENssLcTWYzhFf2TqPIv2wLoqGQgEKhAIACoHCAow4uzwCjCF3bsCMIrOrwM

Investors Brace for a Big Week of Insights Into World Economy - Bloomberg

[unable to retrieve full-text content]

Investors Brace for a Big Week of Insights Into World Economy  Bloomberg

The world economy's ability to rebound from its recent soft patch will be tested anew this week as data is released from Washington to Beijing.


https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-04-28/investors-brace-for-a-big-week-of-insights-into-world-economy

2019-04-28 04:00:00Z
CAIiEFAnmZeNk73o4D9ZwTt8bj4qGQgEKhAIACoHCAow4uzwCjCF3bsCMIrOrwM

Sabtu, 27 April 2019

Uber will soon join an ugly but exclusive club: Unprofitable companies worth more than $50 billion - CNBC

Dara Khosrowshahi, now CEO of Uber, on July 7, 2016 in Sun Valley, Idaho

Drew Angerer | Getty

When Uber starts trading publicly in the coming weeks, it will join a very exclusive but less-than-desirable club — companies worth at least $50 billion that are losing money.

Of the 110 U.S. companies with a market capitalization of at least $50 billion, only three were unprofitable last year: CVS, General Electric and Qualcomm. And Qualcomm doesn't really count because its loss was the result of a one-time charge for a change in the tax code.

Uber reported an operating loss of $3 billion in 2018 after losing more than $4 billion the prior year. (The company recorded a net profit last year because of $5 billion worth of one-time gains, mostly from selling its Russian and Southeast Asian businesses.)

This is Uber's central challenge as it moves from the cozy confines of the Bay Area, where venture capital and private equity firms fund futuristic projects, to the rigors of Wall Street, populated by more risk averse mutual funds and wealth managers focused on financial performance. The latter group has never seen anything like Uber — a company that's already valued as a screaming success even though the business model remains very much a work in progress.

On Friday, Uber set the pricing range of its upcoming IPO of $44 to $50, giving it a market cap of $83.8 billion at the high end. That would make it the 65th most valuable company in the U.S., just behind DowDuPont and in front of U.S. Bancorp, which generated net income last year of $3.8 billion and $7.1 billion, respectively.

"If you're wrong on this and you're paying a sky-high valuation, truly look out below," said Brian Yacktman, chief investment officer of YCG Investments, which manages about $700 million and counts Alphabet and Facebook among the top holdings in its mutual fund. "When you can buy a business at a similar market cap that's currently producing cash flow with much more certainty of outcome, why not take that instead?"

To buy or not to buy

Yacktman sees the value in Uber as a service. He knows it saves time, makes payments easy and provides a much more comfortable ride than your typical cab. Food delivery also makes perfect sense, given there's a huge fleet of cars on the streets.

But Yacktman just doesn't get the investment pitch.

Riders are cost-sensitive and have choices, whether it's Lyft (whose stock is well below its IPO price from last month), a taxi or public transportation. On the flip side, drivers have to make enough money to stay on the platform while also paying for gas and maintenance. After doing what it can to make both riders and drivers happy, and spending the money necessary to run the platform, Uber doesn't have much money left for itself.

Uber has a metric called core platform contribution margin, which is the percentage of revenue left after "direct expenses." That number came in at 9% of revenue for 2018, and that's before accounting for all the investments in emerging products. In the first quarter of 2019, the number is turning south, with Uber expecting a negative margin of between 4% and 7% because of competition and spending on Uber Eats, the food delivery business.

"I'd rather buy one of the host of profitable companies showing me the money now and take a wait-and-see approach with Uber to determine if this is a sustainable profitable business model," said Yacktman.

Large-cap companies that are losing money today are being punished by the market. CVS shares have plunged 22% in the past year, while GE has lost 31%.

Source: CNBC

Uber has a very different story to tell than those two companies, which are stuck in legacy markets and struggling to find opportunities for growth. Only a decade old, Uber is pioneering a new industry and working towards a future of self-driving cars, all while growing 42% last year to over $11 billion in revenue.

Uber's vision is to build global platform that includes ride-sharing in its current form, a continued expansion of Uber Eats and with a whole lot more.

There's Uber Freight, which connects trucking companies with businesses that ship large amounts of goods, autonomous vehicles, drone delivery and Uber Elevate aiming to address "air transportation within cities." Uber also acquired Jump Bikes, which currently has a network of e-bikes in 20 cities, and the company offers electric scooters in eight cities.

For Uber, it all adds up to an addressable market that the company says is in the many trillions of dollars. CEO Dara Khosrowshahi says at the beginning of the video for the online roadshow that the company's "mission is to ignite opportunity by setting the world in motion" and that it's "changing the way people and things move from point A to point B."

Nelson Chai, Uber's finance chief, follows by telling investors that the company is "setting the foundation for attractive long-term margins."

But it's an ambitious plan that requires decades — not years — of investment and far more capital than the $9 billion or so the company is seeking to raise in its IPO. The bet for a public investor is that eventually Uber's experimental projects turn into real businesses and the company will be far enough ahead of any potential competition to have pricing power.

"With Uber, you have the potential to create an ecosystem premium," said Eric Barden, president of Barden Capital in Austin, Texas. "If that's the case, you can be more constructive about future profitability."

Barden has no plans to invest in Uber, because he sees too many variables and risks to that kind of valuation. But he also recognizes that the public market investing landscape has changed in recent years to wildly favor growth investors and that a cash-burning machine like Uber can't be dismissed.

Source: CNBC

Amazon and Netflix are both profitable but just barely. Amazon's net profit margin of 4.3% last year ranked 98th amount the 110 most valuable companies, and Netflix's 7.7% margin was 86th.

Yet, Amazon is up 542% in the past five years, and Netflix has gained 717%. The S&P 500, meanwhile, has climbed just 58% over that stretch.

"Old valuation metrics aren't always applicable anymore," said Barden, who's an investor in both Amazon and Netflix. "It's hard to make money playing the undervaluation arbitrage."

Subscribe to CNBC on YouTube.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.cnbc.com/2019/04/27/uber-one-of-only-3-unprofitable-companies-worth-more-than-50-billion.html

2019-04-27 18:22:10Z
52780278331384

Uber will soon join an ugly but exclusive club: Unprofitable companies worth more than $50 billion - CNBC

Dara Khosrowshahi, now CEO of Uber, on July 7, 2016 in Sun Valley, Idaho

Drew Angerer | Getty

When Uber starts trading publicly in the coming weeks, it will join a very exclusive but less-than-desirable club — companies worth at least $50 billion that are losing money.

Of the 110 U.S. companies with a market capitalization of at least $50 billion, only three were unprofitable last year: CVS, General Electric and Qualcomm. And Qualcomm doesn't really count because its loss was the result of a one-time charge for a change in the tax code.

Uber reported an operating loss of $3 billion in 2018 after losing more than $4 billion the prior year. (The company recorded a net profit last year because of $5 billion worth of one-time gains, mostly from selling its Russian and Southeast Asian businesses.)

This is Uber's central challenge as it moves from the cozy confines of the Bay Area, where venture capital and private equity firms fund futuristic projects, to the rigors of Wall Street, populated by more risk averse mutual funds and wealth managers focused on financial performance. The latter group has never seen anything like Uber — a company that's already valued as a screaming success even though the business model remains very much a work in progress.

On Friday, Uber set the pricing range of its upcoming IPO of $44 to $50, giving it a market cap of $83.8 billion at the high end. That would make it the 65th most valuable company in the U.S., just behind DowDuPont and in front of U.S. Bancorp, which generated net income last year of $3.8 billion and $7.1 billion, respectively.

"If you're wrong on this and you're paying a sky-high valuation, truly look out below," said Brian Yacktman, chief investment officer of YCG Investments, which manages about $700 million and counts Alphabet and Facebook among the top holdings in its mutual fund. "When you can buy a business at a similar market cap that's currently producing cash flow with much more certainty of outcome, why not take that instead?"

To buy or not to buy

Yacktman sees the value in Uber as a service. He knows it saves time, makes payments easy and provides a much more comfortable ride than your typical cab. Food delivery also makes perfect sense, given there's a huge fleet of cars on the streets.

But Yacktman just doesn't get the investment pitch.

Riders are cost-sensitive and have choices, whether it's Lyft (whose stock is well below its IPO price from last month), a taxi or public transportation. On the flip side, drivers have to make enough money to stay on the platform while also paying for gas and maintenance. After doing what it can to make both riders and drivers happy, and spending the money necessary to run the platform, Uber doesn't have much money left for itself.

Uber has a metric called core platform contribution margin, which is the percentage of revenue left after "direct expenses." That number came in at 9% of revenue for 2018, and that's before accounting for all the investments in emerging products. In the first quarter of 2019, the number is turning south, with Uber expecting a negative margin of between 4% and 7% because of competition and spending on Uber Eats, the food delivery business.

"I'd rather buy one of the host of profitable companies showing me the money now and take a wait-and-see approach with Uber to determine if this is a sustainable profitable business model," said Yacktman.

Large-cap companies that are losing money today are being punished by the market. CVS shares have plunged 22% in the past year, while GE has lost 31%.

Source: CNBC

Uber has a very different story to tell than those two companies, which are stuck in legacy markets and struggling to find opportunities for growth. Only a decade old, Uber is pioneering a new industry and working towards a future of self-driving cars, all while growing 42% last year to over $11 billion in revenue.

Uber's vision is to build global platform that includes ride-sharing in its current form, a continued expansion of Uber Eats and with a whole lot more.

There's Uber Freight, which connects trucking companies with businesses that ship large amounts of goods, autonomous vehicles, drone delivery and Uber Elevate aiming to address "air transportation within cities." Uber also acquired Jump Bikes, which currently has a network of e-bikes in 20 cities, and the company offers electric scooters in eight cities.

For Uber, it all adds up to an addressable market that the company says is in the many trillions of dollars. CEO Dara Khosrowshahi says at the beginning of the video for the online roadshow that the company's "mission is to ignite opportunity by setting the world in motion" and that it's "changing the way people and things move from point A to point B."

Nelson Chai, Uber's finance chief, follows by telling investors that the company is "setting the foundation for attractive long-term margins."

But it's an ambitious plan that requires decades — not years — of investment and far more capital than the $9 billion or so the company is seeking to raise in its IPO. The bet for a public investor is that eventually Uber's experimental projects turn into real businesses and the company will be far enough ahead of any potential competition to have pricing power.

"With Uber, you have the potential to create an ecosystem premium," said Eric Barden, president of Barden Capital in Austin, Texas. "If that's the case, you can be more constructive about future profitability."

Barden has no plans to invest in Uber, because he sees too many variables and risks to that kind of valuation. But he also recognizes that the public market investing landscape has changed in recent years to wildly favor growth investors and that a cash-burning machine like Uber can't be dismissed.

Source: CNBC

Amazon and Netflix are both profitable but just barely. Amazon's net profit margin of 4.3% last year ranked 98th amount the 110 most valuable companies, and Netflix's 7.7% margin was 86th.

Yet, Amazon is up 542% in the past five years, and Netflix has gained 717%. The S&P 500, meanwhile, has climbed just 58% over that stretch.

"Old valuation metrics aren't always applicable anymore," said Barden, who's an investor in both Amazon and Netflix. "It's hard to make money playing the undervaluation arbitrage."

Subscribe to CNBC on YouTube.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.cnbc.com/2019/04/27/uber-one-of-only-3-unprofitable-companies-worth-more-than-50-billion.html

2019-04-27 18:09:28Z
52780278331384

Uber will soon join an ugly but exclusive club: Unprofitable companies worth more than $50 billion - CNBC

Dara Khosrowshahi, now CEO of Uber, on July 7, 2016 in Sun Valley, Idaho

Drew Angerer | Getty

When Uber starts trading publicly in the coming weeks, it will join a very exclusive but less-than-desirable club — companies worth at least $50 billion that are losing money.

Of the 110 U.S. companies with a market capitalization of at least $50 billion, only three were unprofitable last year: CVS, General Electric and Qualcomm. And Qualcomm doesn't really count because its loss was the result of a one-time charge for a change in the tax code.

Uber reported an operating loss of $3 billion in 2018 after losing more than $4 billion the prior year. (The company recorded a net profit last year because of $5 billion worth of one-time gains, mostly from selling its Russian and Southeast Asian businesses.)

This is Uber's central challenge as it moves from the cozy confines of the Bay Area, where venture capital and private equity firms fund futuristic projects, to the rigors of Wall Street, populated by more risk averse mutual funds and wealth managers focused on financial performance. The latter group has never seen anything like Uber — a company that's already valued as a screaming success even though the business model remains very much a work in progress.

On Friday, Uber set the pricing range of its upcoming IPO of $44 to $50, giving it a market cap of $83.8 billion at the high end. That would make it the 65th most valuable company in the U.S., just behind DowDuPont and in front of U.S. Bancorp, which generated net income last year of $3.8 billion and $7.1 billion, respectively.

"If you're wrong on this and you're paying a sky-high valuation, truly look out below," said Brian Yacktman, chief investment officer of YCG Investments, which manages about $700 million and counts Alphabet and Facebook among the top holdings in its mutual fund. "When you can buy a business at a similar market cap that's currently producing cash flow with much more certainty of outcome, why not take that instead?"

To buy or not to buy

Yacktman sees the value in Uber as a service. He knows it saves time, makes payments easy and provides a much more comfortable ride than your typical cab. Food delivery also makes perfect sense, given there's a huge fleet of cars on the streets.

But Yacktman just doesn't get the investment pitch.

Riders are cost-sensitive and have choices, whether it's Lyft (whose stock is well below its IPO price from last month), a taxi or public transportation. On the flip side, drivers have to make enough money to stay on the platform while also paying for gas and maintenance. After doing what it can to make both riders and drivers happy, and spending the money necessary to run the platform, Uber doesn't have much money left for itself.

Uber has a metric called core platform contribution margin, which is the percentage of revenue left after "direct expenses." That number came in at 9% of revenue for 2018, and that's before accounting for all the investments in emerging products. In the first quarter of 2019, the number is turning south, with Uber expecting a negative margin of between 4% and 7% because of competition and spending on Uber Eats, the food delivery business.

"I'd rather buy one of the host of profitable companies showing me the money now and take a wait-and-see approach with Uber to determine if this is a sustainable profitable business model," said Yacktman.

Large-cap companies that are losing money today are being punished by the market. CVS shares have plunged 22% in the past year, while GE has lost 31%.

Source: CNBC

Uber has a very different story to tell than those two companies, which are stuck in legacy markets and struggling to find opportunities for growth. Only a decade old, Uber is pioneering a new industry and working towards a future of self-driving cars, all while growing 42% last year to over $11 billion in revenue.

Uber's vision is to build global platform that includes ride-sharing in its current form, a continued expansion of Uber Eats and with a whole lot more.

There's Uber Freight, which connects trucking companies with businesses that ship large amounts of goods, autonomous vehicles, drone delivery and Uber Elevate aiming to address "air transportation within cities." Uber also acquired Jump Bikes, which currently has a network of e-bikes in 20 cities, and the company offers electric scooters in eight cities.

For Uber, it all adds up to an addressable market that the company says is in the many trillions of dollars. CEO Dara Khosrowshahi says at the beginning of the video for the online roadshow that the company's "mission is to ignite opportunity by setting the world in motion" and that it's "changing the way people and things move from point A to point B."

Nelson Chai, Uber's finance chief, follows by telling investors that the company is "setting the foundation for attractive long-term margins."

But it's an ambitious plan that requires decades — not years — of investment and far more capital than the $9 billion or so the company is seeking to raise in its IPO. The bet for a public investor is that eventually Uber's experimental projects turn into real businesses and the company will be far enough ahead of any potential competition to have pricing power.

"With Uber, you have the potential to create an ecosystem premium," said Eric Barden, president of Barden Capital in Austin, Texas. "If that's the case, you can be more constructive about future profitability."

Barden has no plans to invest in Uber, because he sees too many variables and risks to that kind of valuation. But he also recognizes that the public market investing landscape has changed in recent years to wildly favor growth investors and that a cash-burning machine like Uber can't be dismissed.

Source: CNBC

Amazon and Netflix are both profitable but just barely. Amazon's net profit margin of 4.3% last year ranked 98th amount the 110 most valuable companies, and Netflix's 7.7% margin was 86th.

Yet, Amazon is up 542% in the past five years, and Netflix has gained 717%. The S&P 500, meanwhile, has climbed just 58% over that stretch.

"Old valuation metrics aren't always applicable anymore," said Barden, who's an investor in both Amazon and Netflix. "It's hard to make money playing the undervaluation arbitrage."

Subscribe to CNBC on YouTube.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.cnbc.com/2019/04/27/uber-one-of-only-3-unprofitable-companies-worth-more-than-50-billion.html

2019-04-27 17:53:54Z
52780278331384

Uber will soon join an ugly but exclusive club: Unprofitable companies worth more than $50 billion - CNBC

Dara Khosrowshahi, now CEO of Uber, on July 7, 2016 in Sun Valley, Idaho

Drew Angerer | Getty

When Uber starts trading publicly in the coming weeks, it will join a very exclusive but less-than-desirable club — companies worth at least $50 billion that are losing money.

Of the 110 U.S. companies with a market capitalization of at least $50 billion, only three were unprofitable last year: CVS, General Electric and Qualcomm. And Qualcomm doesn't really count because its loss was the result of a one-time charge for a change in the tax code.

Uber reported an operating loss of $3 billion in 2018 after losing more than $4 billion the prior year. (The company recorded a net profit last year because of $5 billion worth of one-time gains, mostly from selling its Russian and Southeast Asian businesses.)

This is Uber's central challenge as it moves from the cozy confines of the Bay Area, where venture capital and private equity firms fund futuristic projects, to the rigors of Wall Street, populated by more risk averse mutual funds and wealth managers focused on financial performance. The latter group has never seen anything like Uber — a company that's already valued as a screaming success even though the business model remains very much a work in progress.

On Friday, Uber set the pricing range of its upcoming IPO of $44 to $50, giving it a market cap of $83.8 billion at the high end. That would make it the 65th most valuable company in the U.S., just behind DowDuPont and in front of U.S. Bancorp, which generated net income last year of $3.8 billion and $7.1 billion, respectively.

"If you're wrong on this and you're paying a sky-high valuation, truly look out below," said Brian Yacktman, chief investment officer of YCG Investments, which manages about $700 million and counts Alphabet and Facebook among the top holdings in its mutual fund. "When you can buy a business at a similar market cap that's currently producing cash flow with much more certainty of outcome, why not take that instead?"

To buy or not to buy

Yacktman sees the value in Uber as a service. He knows it saves time, makes payments easy and provides a much more comfortable ride than your typical cab. Food delivery also makes perfect sense, given there's a huge fleet of cars on the streets.

But Yacktman just doesn't get the investment pitch.

Riders are cost-sensitive and have choices, whether it's Lyft (whose stock is well below its IPO price from last month), a taxi or public transportation. On the flip side, drivers have to make enough money to stay on the platform while also paying for gas and maintenance. After doing what it can to make both riders and drivers happy, and spending the money necessary to run the platform, Uber doesn't have much money left for itself.

Uber has a metric called core platform contribution margin, which is the percentage of revenue left after "direct expenses." That number came in at 9% of revenue for 2018, and that's before accounting for all the investments in emerging products. In the first quarter of 2019, the number is turning south, with Uber expecting a negative margin of between 4% and 7% because of competition and spending on Uber Eats, the food delivery business.

"I'd rather buy one of the host of profitable companies showing me the money now and take a wait-and-see approach with Uber to determine if this is a sustainable profitable business model," said Yacktman.

Large-cap companies that are losing money today are being punished by the market. CVS shares have plunged 22% in the past year, while GE has lost 31%.

Source: CNBC

Uber has a very different story to tell than those two companies, which are stuck in legacy markets and struggling to find opportunities for growth. Only a decade old, Uber is pioneering a new industry and working towards a future of self-driving cars, all while growing 42% last year to over $11 billion in revenue.

Uber's vision is to build global platform that includes ride-sharing in its current form, a continued expansion of Uber Eats and with a whole lot more.

There's Uber Freight, which connects trucking companies with businesses that ship large amounts of goods, autonomous vehicles, drone delivery and Uber Elevate aiming to address "air transportation within cities." Uber also acquired Jump Bikes, which currently has a network of e-bikes in 20 cities, and the company offers electric scooters in eight cities.

For Uber, it all adds up to an addressable market that the company says is in the many trillions of dollars. CEO Dara Khosrowshahi says at the beginning of the video for the online roadshow that the company's "mission is to ignite opportunity by setting the world in motion" and that it's "changing the way people and things move from point A to point B."

Nelson Chai, Uber's finance chief, follows by telling investors that the company is "setting the foundation for attractive long-term margins."

But it's an ambitious plan that requires decades — not years — of investment and far more capital than the $9 billion or so the company is seeking to raise in its IPO. The bet for a public investor is that eventually Uber's experimental projects turn into real businesses and the company will be far enough ahead of any potential competition to have pricing power.

"With Uber, you have the potential to create an ecosystem premium," said Eric Barden, president of Barden Capital in Austin, Texas. "If that's the case, you can be more constructive about future profitability."

Barden has no plans to invest in Uber, because he sees too many variables and risks to that kind of valuation. But he also recognizes that the public market investing landscape has changed in recent years to wildly favor growth investors and that a cash-burning machine like Uber can't be dismissed.

Source: CNBC

Amazon and Netflix are both profitable but just barely. Amazon's net profit margin of 4.3% last year ranked 98th amount the 110 most valuable companies, and Netflix's 7.7% margin was 86th.

Yet, Amazon is up 542% in the past five years, and Netflix has gained 717%. The S&P 500, meanwhile, has climbed just 58% over that stretch.

"Old valuation metrics aren't always applicable anymore," said Barden, who's an investor in both Amazon and Netflix. "It's hard to make money playing the undervaluation arbitrage."

Subscribe to CNBC on YouTube.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.cnbc.com/2019/04/27/uber-one-of-only-3-unprofitable-companies-worth-more-than-50-billion.html

2019-04-27 17:37:11Z
52780278331384

Uber will soon join an ugly but exclusive club: Unprofitable companies worth more than $50 billion - CNBC

Dara Khosrowshahi, now CEO of Uber, on July 7, 2016 in Sun Valley, Idaho

Drew Angerer | Getty

When Uber starts trading publicly in the coming weeks, it will join a very exclusive but less-than-desirable club — companies worth at least $50 billion that are losing money.

Of the 110 U.S. companies with a market capitalization of at least $50 billion, only three were unprofitable last year: CVS, General Electric and Qualcomm. And Qualcomm doesn't really count because its loss was the result of a one-time charge for a change in the tax code.

Uber reported an operating loss of $3 billion in 2018 after losing more than $4 billion the prior year. (The company recorded a net profit last year because of $5 billion worth of one-time gains, mostly from selling its Russian and Southeast Asian businesses.)

This is Uber's central challenge as it moves from the cozy confines of the Bay Area, where venture capital and private equity firms fund futuristic projects, to the rigors of Wall Street, populated by more risk averse mutual funds and wealth managers focused on financial performance. The latter group has never seen anything like Uber — a company that's already valued as a screaming success even though the business model remains very much a work in progress.

On Friday, Uber set the pricing range of its upcoming IPO of $44 to $50, giving it a market cap of $83.8 billion at the high end. That would make it the 65th most valuable company in the U.S., just behind DowDuPont and in front of U.S. Bancorp, which generated net income last year of $3.8 billion and $7.1 billion, respectively.

"If you're wrong on this and you're paying a sky-high valuation, truly look out below," said Brian Yacktman, chief investment officer of YCG Investments, which manages about $700 million and counts Alphabet and Facebook among the top holdings in its mutual fund. "When you can buy a business at a similar market cap that's currently producing cash flow with much more certainty of outcome, why not take that instead?"

To buy or not to buy

Yacktman sees the value in Uber as a service. He knows it saves time, makes payments easy and provides a much more comfortable ride than your typical cab. Food delivery also makes perfect sense, given there's a huge fleet of cars on the streets.

But Yacktman just doesn't get the investment pitch.

Riders are cost-sensitive and have choices, whether it's Lyft (whose stock is well below its IPO price from last month), a taxi or public transportation. On the flip side, drivers have to make enough money to stay on the platform while also paying for gas and maintenance. After doing what it can to make both riders and drivers happy, and spending the money necessary to run the platform, Uber doesn't have much money left for itself.

Uber has a metric called core platform contribution margin, which is the percentage of revenue left after "direct expenses." That number came in at 9% of revenue for 2018, and that's before accounting for all the investments in emerging products. In the first quarter of 2019, the number is turning south, with Uber expecting a negative margin of between 4% and 7% because of competition and spending on Uber Eats, the food delivery business.

"I'd rather buy one of the host of profitable companies showing me the money now and take a wait-and-see approach with Uber to determine if this is a sustainable profitable business model," said Yacktman.

Large-cap companies that are losing money today are being punished by the market. CVS shares have plunged 22% in the past year, while GE has lost 31%.

Source: CNBC

Uber has a very different story to tell than those two companies, which are stuck in legacy markets and struggling to find opportunities for growth. Only a decade old, Uber is pioneering a new industry and working towards a future of self-driving cars, all while growing 42% last year to over $11 billion in revenue.

Uber's vision is to build global platform that includes ride-sharing in its current form, a continued expansion of Uber Eats and with a whole lot more.

There's Uber Freight, which connects trucking companies with businesses that ship large amounts of goods, autonomous vehicles, drone delivery and Uber Elevate aiming to address "air transportation within cities." Uber also acquired Jump Bikes, which currently has a network of e-bikes in 20 cities, and the company offers electric scooters in eight cities.

For Uber, it all adds up to an addressable market that the company says is in the many trillions of dollars. CEO Dara Khosrowshahi says at the beginning of the video for the online roadshow that the company's "mission is to ignite opportunity by setting the world in motion" and that it's "changing the way people and things move from point A to point B."

Nelson Chai, Uber's finance chief, follows by telling investors that the company is "setting the foundation for attractive long-term margins."

But it's an ambitious plan that requires decades — not years — of investment and far more capital than the $9 billion or so the company is seeking to raise in its IPO. The bet for a public investor is that eventually Uber's experimental projects turn into real businesses and the company will be far enough ahead of any potential competition to have pricing power.

"With Uber, you have the potential to create an ecosystem premium," said Eric Barden, president of Barden Capital in Austin, Texas. "If that's the case, you can be more constructive about future profitability."

Barden has no plans to invest in Uber, because he sees too many variables and risks to that kind of valuation. But he also recognizes that the public market investing landscape has changed in recent years to wildly favor growth investors and that a cash-burning machine like Uber can't be dismissed.

Source: CNBC

Amazon and Netflix are both profitable but just barely. Amazon's net profit margin of 4.3% last year ranked 98th amount the 110 most valuable companies, and Netflix's 7.7% margin was 86th.

Yet, Amazon is up 542% in the past five years, and Netflix has gained 717%. The S&P 500, meanwhile, has climbed just 58% over that stretch.

"Old valuation metrics aren't always applicable anymore," said Barden, who's an investor in both Amazon and Netflix. "It's hard to make money playing the undervaluation arbitrage."

Subscribe to CNBC on YouTube.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.cnbc.com/2019/04/27/uber-one-of-only-3-unprofitable-companies-worth-more-than-50-billion.html

2019-04-27 16:38:09Z
52780278331384

Stocks To Watch: Eyes On Apple, Uber, F8 And Avengers - Seeking Alpha

[unable to retrieve full-text content]

Stocks To Watch: Eyes On Apple, Uber, F8 And Avengers  Seeking Alpha

Welcome to Seeking Alpha's Stocks to Watch - a preview of key events scheduled for the next week. Follow this account and turn the e-mail alert on to receive th.


https://seekingalpha.com/article/4257405-stocks-watch-eyes-apple-uber-f8-avengers

2019-04-27 13:12:00Z
CAIiEJ-MArOQ8OZ5gXSMYcXShNgqFQgEKg0IACoGCAowkqEGMJBZMPCxAw

Jumat, 26 April 2019

Here's who stands to get rich from Uber's IPO - CNBC

Uber seeks to raise about $9 billion in cash in its initial public offering next month when it is expected to debut on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol "UBER."

The company plans to offer 180 million shares at $44 to $50 per share, according to an updated filing released Friday morning, valuing the company between $80.53 billion and $91.51 billion on a fully diluted basis. The valuation is well below earlier reports that suggested Uber could be valued as high as $120 billion. At the low end of its price range, Uber's market cap would be $73.7 billion, which would even fall below its last private valuation of about $76 billion.

Even at the lower end of its pricing, Uber will still be the largest tech IPO to debut this year. The company may have scaled back expectations after seeing excitement around its rival Lyft's stock quickly fizzle out. The stock, which has a market cap of about $16 billion, is down more than 27% for the quarter since debuting in late March.

Still, Uber's IPO is set to make its top shareholders worth billions. Assuming Uber prices at $47 per share, the midpoint of its stated range, SoftBank stands to gain the most from the IPO. Based on its post-IPO share count in the filing, the firm would earn more than $10 billion in the offering. Even Uber's ousted former CEO and co-founder Travis Kalanick stands to gain $5.3 billion in the IPO, based on the same assumptions. His co-founder, Garrett Camp, stands to gain about $3.7 billion through LLCs he manages, under these assumptions.

Here's where each major shareholder will stand after the public offering, based on their post-IPO share counts and assuming Uber prices at the midpoint of its stated range at $47 per share:

Subscribe to CNBC on YouTube.

Watch: Uber anticipates IPO price between $44-50 per share

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.cnbc.com/2019/04/26/uber-ipo-the-largest-shareholders.html

2019-04-26 18:10:36Z
52780277031922

Ford under criminal investigation for emissions testing problems - The Verge

Ford Motor Company admitted in a financial filing on Friday that it’s under investigation by the US Department of Justice over its internal emissions testing practices. The investigation is still in the “preliminary stages,” according to the automaker.

Notably, Ford says the investigation has nothing to do with the use of “defeat devices,” or software meant to deceive regulators, which was the issue at the center of Volkswagen’s Dieselgate scandal.

Ford announced in February that it had launched an investigation into its own emissions testing practices after employees raised red flags over potential consistency problems. Those employees discovered Ford may have been miscalculating “road load,” which is a measurement of the forces — like aerodynamic drag or tire resistance — on a car when it’s traveling at a constant speed on smooth, flat ground. (Coming up with a lower road load figure in the lab versus in the real world, for example, could lead an automaker to believe its cars were getting better fuel economy and therefore emitting less pollution.)

The company said it hired law firm Sidley Austin to perform the investigation, and alerted the Environmental Protection Agency. Ford said Friday that it’s also now working with the California Air Resources Board to fix whatever problems might exist.

“The Department of Justice contacted us earlier this month to let us know that they had opened a criminal investigation,” the company said Friday in a statement to The Verge. “Ford is fully cooperating with the government, and we’ll keep them posted on what we’re finding through our investigation and technical review.”

Both Daimler (the parent company of Mercedes-Benz) and Fiat Chrysler Automobiles are also reportedly under criminal investigation regarding emissions, though like Volkswagen, they allegedly did use defeat devices to make some diesel cars appear cleaner to regulators. Daimler and Fiat Chrysler have faced civil charges, too. In January, Fiat Chrysler settled a civil case with the US Department of Justice for $800 million. The company also recalled 862,000 cars in March. Meanwhile, a class-action lawsuit against Daimler in the US recently got the green light to move ahead in a New Jersey court.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.theverge.com/2019/4/26/18517991/ford-criminal-investigation-emissions-testing-problems-dieselgate

2019-04-26 17:26:50Z
52780277765177

US economy posts strong first quarter, but consumer spending slows - CNN

But digging into the details of the report reveals that weakness remains in the American economy.
The Bureau of Economic Analysis reported that gross domestic product grew at an annual rate of 3.2%, substantially above the projected 2.1%, buoyed by stronger state and local government spending, lower imports and business inventories.
The rate is a first estimate, and it may be revised as more data comes in over the next few weeks. It would have been even stronger, the BEA concluded, without the government shutdown — which subtracted 0.3 percentage points from growth in the first quarter rate. Federal spending was flat, since a rise in military spending was offset by a decline in non-defense spending.
The contribution from state and local government spending came largely as a result of highway and road construction, which localities have taken on while waiting for an infrastructure package from the federal government.
Underlying components in the report, however, suggest a broadly anticipated slowdown is still underway.
Growth was driven in part by higher inventories, especially in the manufacturing industry, which can indicate that businesses are stockpiling goods rather than selling them. Higher inventories can often foreshadow slower growth in the next quarter. Domestic private sales, which subtract out imports and exports as well as government spending, decelerated to half the rate of the previous quarter — the smallest gain in three years.
4 ways Trump's tax cuts changed the American economy
Imports collapsed, in part because businesses had rushed to bring in goods from overseas in advance of the Trump administration's tariffs last year. "With stock rooms and backlots now filling up, businesses saw no reason to buy more," wrote Bernard Baumohl, chief global economist with the Economic Outlook Group. "Worse, many companies now fear it will take far longer to unload all this inventory, given the apparent underlying weakness in consumer and business demand.
Meanwhile, consumer spending slowed, in part due to weak sales of goods, in particular light trucks. Business investment also slowed from the previous quarter, with agricultural machinery and office furniture posting the largest declines. The biggest boost for business investment came from intellectual property products. Exports are expected to slow, facing headwinds from a strengthening dollar.
"Taking out the oversized boosts from net trade, inventories and highways investment, which will all be reversed in the coming quarters, growth was only around 1%," wrote Paul Ashworth, chief US economist with the research firm Capital Economics. "Under those circumstances, we continue to expect that overall growth will slow this year, forcing the Fed to begin cutting interest rates before year-end."
Why big business is giving up its fight against a higher minimum wage
Forecasters are already tamping down their expectations. Morgan Stanley's economics team revised their second quarter estimate to 1.1%, for example, citing the buildup in inventories. The Conference Board is slightly more optimistic, projecting 2.5% growth next quarter, but they also forecast a slowdown to 2.3% for the second half of the year.
One looming question: Will these surprising numbers change the Federal Reserve's stated plans to hold off on interest rate hikes for the remainder of the year? Not if they look at the underlying numbers, writes Joseph Brusuelas, chief economist with the accounting firm RSM US. Inflation is well below the Fed's 2% target. Core personal consumption expenditures — a key metric that strips out volatile food and energy prices — rose only 1.3% year-over-year in the first quarter.
"The Federal Reserve will look right past the 3.2% quarterly growth estimate and focus on the composition of growth, which points to a slowing trend amid softening inflation," Brusuelas wrote. "This data reinforces the prudent pause the Fed is engaged in, and forward-looking investors and chief financial officers should expect no rate hike or rate cut until 2021."

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.cnn.com/2019/04/26/economy/us-gdp-report-q1/index.html

2019-04-26 15:47:00Z
52780277071799